 |









 |
fantasywithbite
dark_phoenix54 | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The Sandman, by Neil Gaiman and various artists. 10 Volume compilation of the comic book series.
Living in the boondocks as I do, I missed these comics when they were originally published-probably the only goth who didn’t read them back then. In one way I’m glad: I would have hated waiting between issues. I devoured these books over the course of a month- I resisted the urge to grab all 10 at once when they showed up at the library, even though I wanted to just scream “All mine!” and run cackling out the door.
These are the most sophisticated comics I’ve ever read. Gaiman mixes his own creations, The Endless Ones (who include Dream, Death, Delirium, Desire, Destiny and Despair), with the pantheons of Greece, Egypt, Norway, the Bible and adds the world of faerie for good measure. Dream’s world is seductive and coming up out of it after a thorough immersion- reading a whole volume in one sitting- requires some adjustment of thought, so total is Gaiman’s world building. These aren’t happy little stories, though. There are no deus ex machine endings here; things come at a cost. Excellent writing; if you like myth you’ll like these, even if comics aren’t your usual reading.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
fantasywithbite
winterfox | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Valente's Under in the Mere was an interesting read. I'm familiar with the source material (well, not the Vulgate Cycle, but Malory and Gawain the Green Knight, which in any case appear to be the primary source here) though I'm no medieval romance expert. It let me "get" the references, which for the Green Knight chapter I think is essential, since the allusions to the seduction/hunting game would probably not make sense otherwise.
I'm not sure I can give much of a critical thought about this book, since for the most part the Athurian framework seems to serve as a canvas for prose-poetry and not much else, though I appreciated the imagery of knights as automata and the Dagonet chapter (more Idylls of the King than Malory, though the specifics are mostly Valente) was my favorite. The rest are a bit hit-and-miss, and my interest flagged entirely while going through Pellinore's and Galahad's sections. I enjoyed the familiar Valente theme of monsters' perspectives (Bertilak, Pellinore, arguably Mordred) and her Morgan is quietly excellent, but on the whole I came away from Under in the Mere a little unsatisfied. I should say, though, that I'm not a reader of poetry: I like pretty language as much as anyone, but without substance to hold it together it's harder to appreciate.
What did everyone else think? I'm especially interested in how people unfamiliar with Malory/et al responded to it.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



|
 |
|
 |